The topic of Q rather abruptly entered the room again this year when Bill Maher, no conservative, confessed in February that he’d misjudged “QAnon,” in light of the Epstein revelations. “I can’t believe I’m saying this, but where does QAnon go for the apology?” Anons had been talking about the existence of pedophile rings in the highest levels of government and entertainment since 2018, when it still sounded kooky.
Virtually no one has talked about Q since the bulk of the nearly 5,000 Q posts ended in 2020. Q was an anonymous poster in the Wild West of the internet from 2017 to 2020. Many readers became convinced from the content that Q was someone close to the top, who seemed to have inside information. Some people thought it was Trump; most thought it was one of his advisors. The Anons were those who did the research to make sense of the posts, which often asked Socratic questions or spoke in coded language.
The ferocity with which Q was denounced by the entire mainstream media made me think Q had touched a nerve. Q represented the threat of some entity reaching people directly, without the filters of the corporate media. In 2017, that was still rare.
The ferocity with which Q was denounced by the entire mainstream media made me think Q had touched a nerve.Tweet ThisQ drop October 14, 2020
Your ability to spread information across the digital battlefield and bypass their control is what they fear [narrative failure] and why they are doing everything in their power to disrupt…
Six years later, does Q have anything to tell us? I think so: encouragement on the eve of battle. Q posited a conflict between good/innocent/ordinary people and the darker side of evil/corrupt/elite figures. St. John Paul II (as Cardinal Wojtyla) had said something similar in 1976: “We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through.”
That battle is about to burst out in the open. It’s not a strictly political battle; it has the nature of darkness fighting light. Granted, many on the side of evil are gravely misled and may not have intended to go so far, but that’s where they’ve landed. Evil is a cunning master.
The Q posts awakened a slice of America to the possibility that our government and elite class might not have our best interests at heart; might, in fact, be insidiously at war against us. Then legions more came to that realization in 2020 and 2021, from the lockdowns and experimental shot.
We now know the six-foot rule was pulled from the ether; we know children were never at risk from COVID and should not have been locked down, to their permanent harm; we know it was not an “abundance of caution” but deliberate deception; we know the shot has done great damage. We know many ingredients in our food system are poisonous, that many medications hurt more than help, and that “informed consent” went down the drain in 2021.
And now, just last week, we’ve learned that some polling data, which plays a part in electing our leaders, is game-playing and lazy vetting. Most of us haven’t trusted polls since Hillary Clinton was widely projected to win in 2016. Nevertheless, polls still drive decisions on how to allocate ad spending and whether or not seemingly trailing candidates remain in the race. Welp. It’s as phony as we thought.
We’ve gotten the awakening we needed. I think that was always the goal of the Q operation, to shake people out of their lethargy, to be ready to fight for freedom and family. Something wicked was pounding at the gate, and someone had to turn out the guard.
Something wicked was pounding at the gate, and someone had to turn out the guard.Tweet ThisQ drop on May 6, 2020: Sometimes you can’t tell the public the truth. You must show them. Only then will people find the will to change.
The horns of war have been blown. Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice in a February 2026 interview outlined the Democrat plan for an “accountability agenda” to target Trump allies. And the revelation in the Senate earlier this month of a 640,000-name spreadsheet created by former Special Counsel Jack Smith identifying ordinary citizens who donated small amounts to Trump’s campaigns or bought red MAGA hats seems to constitute a detailed map for retaliation in the event of a blue wave. Over on Bluesky, the notorious alternative to X (which I don’t recommend entering without a hazmat suit), people are crowing things like, “When we’re in charge, you’ll all be in jail” and wishing Charlie Kirk-style endings on us. Democrat Senator Elissa Slotkin spoke at the University of Chicago this month, using threats of prosecution to scare young people from ever serving in a Republican administration. “I want that deterrence message sent,” Slotkin said. A United States senator, for goodness’ sake.
If the mythological blue wave materializes, they will come for us: pro-lifers, Christians, conservatives, and certainly anyone who openly supported President Trump. If the blue wave turns out to have been wishful thinking, there’s another plan. A highly respected researcher, DataRepublican, has released troves of evidence this week that an organized coalition of blue state governors, ex-USAID employees, and disgruntled Obama officials plans to subvert, and separate from, the federal government in the event of a red wave. Anyone wondering what sedition actually looks like can read here or listen here. The plan sounds suspiciously like secession, à la the Confederacy in 1861, which should strike fear in anyone who reads history.
Could the message be any more clear? As Andrew Breitbart famously stated in 2011… “War.” We don’t want it, but it will be delivered to our doorsteps, no matter how the midterms turn out. It’s been coming for a very long time, from the first moment a political body embraced the killing of inconvenient children and declared itself for evil.
It’s been coming for a very long time, from the first moment a political body embraced the killing of inconvenient children and declared itself for evil.Tweet ThisQ drop on January 19, 2018
You, the People, have the power. You, the People, just forgot how to play. Together you are strong. Apart you are weak. They want you divided. They want race wars. They want class wars. They want religious wars. They want political wars. They want you divided. Learn! For God and country, learn!
Stay strong. Stay together. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT.
This is more important than you can imagine.
In a sense, some approached Q like a good puzzle, trying to tease out the meaning of some of the more cryptic messages. But Q was deadly serious. The fight is at hand. And it’s a spiritual battle, which Q also seemed to recognize.
Q drop on September 20, 2020:
Strengthen my faith, Lord. Forgive my sins, so that I may be clean in your righteousness. Make me brave, so I can stand and fight the spiritual battles in my life and in our world.
It was perhaps the goal of Q (and St. John Paul II) to invite us to consider what is worth fighting for, and prepare us to undertake the hardship of it. Will we hide from battle, and passively bear the evil wished upon us and our children? Or will we fortify ourselves like the Holy League at Lepanto and defend what is truly good?
There will not be a neutral ground.
Note: Q often wrote in all caps, which I have modified for easier reading. I left one particular line in caps because it has become a part of our national folklore (FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT). Those repeated words appeared in several Q posts back in 2018, long before the assassination attempt on President Trump in 2024.
There are no comments yet.